This article is a review and summary of the teachings of
Frederic Woodman Root (1846-1926), a well-known vocal pedagogue of his time and
author of 18 books on vocal pedagogy. Singer and voice teacher David Grogan
authored the article and provides musical examples and excerpts from some of
Root’s books.
Grogan
gives a general overview of Root’s methods for teaching voice. Root begins with
basic musicianship (learning the names of notes, keys, learning rhythms, etc.). He said he found no point in studying the voice if basic musicianship skills
were not in place. Then Root emphasizes “The General Principle,” his slogan of
choice in dealing with the coordination of singing. The General Principle
states that in order to produce a good sound, the singer must combine the three
basic elements of singing; breath control, tone quality, and free and natural
action of the articulators. In the simultaneous combination of these elements,
good singing occurs.
The rest of
the article goes into specifics about how Root would teach his students about
breath control, vowels, registers, and so on. One interesting point from these
sections is Root’s thought on vowel forms. Root taught that [i] [a] and [u]
were gateways to understanding three different tone qualities: bright, radical,
and sombre. Grogan provides singing exercises from Root’s books and explains
how Root would have used them to help the singer.
Grogan concludes that although Root is nothing magical or new to vocal pedagogy, he is clear and succinct and that “vague generalizations (about vocal pedagogy) become clear instructions in Root’s books.”
I really like that he starts with musicianship, that is even more so the "basics" of singing. Because really, people that can 'sing' but can't read music are so limited in their abilities. I'm definitely going to look into Root's books for the final, and just in general I suppose.
ReplyDeleteI agree with starting with musicianship. When I first got into choir in high school my teacher basically taught us by rote and actually knowing the note names, rhythms, and intervals came second. Then when I took a music theory class with the band students I was completely lost because they learned those fundamentals first. I also like what you were talking about with the vowels and what is best to start out with for new students.
ReplyDeleteMusicianship should be number one. I agree with this 100%. It is never enjoyable when a person is only singing the notes on a page like a robot.
ReplyDeleteMusicianship should be number one. I agree with this 100%. It is never enjoyable when a person is only singing the notes on a page like a robot.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your presentation and for your thoughts on this, you went in all the directions I would hope for differing thoughts on some of the material presented. :-) One more reason to know function and science: you can know how to pick through what is worth listening to and what is not. :-)
ReplyDeleteI think musicianship is the most important so people can learn music on their own and people that have good musicianship skills usually learn quicker too. The way Root teaches is a little different than I would teach but voice practices and vocal styles have changed in the last 115 years.
ReplyDeleteI think it is vital to learn about musicianship. Often, I know I've struggled with portraying the musicianship because I'm so focused on precision. Not always is it about being 100% accurate, 100% of the time. If you perform everything with complete accuracy without emotion, it's absolutely boring. Everything ties together!
ReplyDeleteI agree that musicianship should be taught, but I don't necessarily agree that it should be taught "first." Musicianship allows for more and more difficult repertoire to be performed, but I would argue that technique and expressiveness are just as important.
ReplyDeleteThis is a cool article! The science of singing is important, but I think musicianship is much, much more important.
ReplyDeleteInteresting. I think I want to read your article(s) on the subject. Though I think have a little bit of basic "musicianship" is helpful when we start individual lessons, or even choral singing, I think it is also our job to help students learn how to create music no matter what level their at, even if that is teaching them a lot of the basics. No student, especially those who want to learn about a subject and are enthusiastic about it, should be turned out because they don't have the skills at that immediate moment. Help them learn, or direct them to someone who can help them learn, the basics.
ReplyDeleteGood article for reading, I haven't think about the musicianship before, but now I got the idea, it is really true.
ReplyDeleteAs with any discipline, it can be very useful to learn the history of how vocal technique was taught. Educational philosophies change over time and certain things go in and out of vogue, but that doesn't necessarily mean that old techniques are not as good or better than what is popular today. In this case, it sounds like the foundations have not changed much since Root, with musicianship being paramount to further development.
ReplyDeleteMusicianship is absolutely one of the most important aspects. So often we get caught up in the rhythm, notes, and technique and forget about phrasing. Joyce Didonato says something to the effect of I master my technique and notes so I have all the energy I need to devote to being artistic.
ReplyDeleteHmm, sounds like that was a good article. :) I really liked the bit about [i] [a] and [u] being representative of three different tone qualities!
ReplyDeleteI think we're going to get a unified Korea before we get a unified method of teaching voice.
ReplyDelete